An antidetect browser ranking based on public data. Every figure has a source — a published test, pricing page, company statement, or review on another platform; we keep the sources for verification. We use the same formula to calculate every browser's position.
Latest checks: public tests — October 9, 2026 · security history — October 8, 2026 · prices checked no earlier than October 8, 2026
We compare antidetect browsers using verifiable data: public fingerprint test results, prices listed on service websites, documentation, and publicly reported security history. Each browser page includes pricing, security history, and, where available, public checker tests, news, and reviews. We keep the source of every fact for verification.
We do not run our own checker tests yet. We compile fingerprint scores from published tests and label them accordingly: “based on public tests.” Once we start running our own tests, they will replace the public tests.
The ranking excludes abandoned projects (no releases for more than a year), VPNs, regular privacy browsers, and session managers that do not spoof fingerprints.
We only use information that can be accessed and verified. We double-check everything in a separate pass by reopening every source and looking for contradictions.
Published results from runs on the ranking’s checkers: Pixelscan, CreepJS, BrowserLeaks, Iphey, Whoer, fv.pro, BrowserScan, AmIUnique, DeviceInfo and f.vision. For each result, we keep the link, the date, and the publisher: an independent author, the service’s partner, a competitor, or the checker owner. Developer claims about their own browser are not included in the score.
We use the service’s own pricing pages. The ranking shows the cheapest paid plan with monthly billing and the number of profiles included. If monthly billing is not available, we divide the annual price by 12. We convert euros to dollars only for comparison.
Based on the service’s website and documentation: browser engines, operating systems, API and automation, team access, cloud profile sync, mobile profiles, and cryptocurrency payments.
Hacks, leaks, attacks through updates, and account takeovers. We search the company’s official channels, the media, researchers’ publications, and vulnerability databases. We count cases confirmed by the company itself or by two independent sources. If we find nothing, we write “no public reports found” and include the date of the check rather than calling the service “secure.”
Major review platforms, software directories, and forums over the past two years. We summarize each review in the first person, keeping its facts and figures, and keep the address of the original for verification. We show stars only when the author gave them, and the average on a browser’s page once there are at least five such ratings. Reviews showing signs of manipulation or written for a reward are neither shown nor counted.
From changelogs, blogs, and services’ official channels: browser engine updates, new features, and pricing changes. Each news item has the date of the event; we keep its sources for verification.
One formula determines the position for every browser. Each component is scored from 0 to 100, with fixed weights:
total = 0.5 · fingerprint + 0.2 · entry price + 0.2 · features + 0.1 · user rating
50%
Checker result: passed — 1, partial — 0.5, failed — 0. The result's weight depends on who published it: an independent author — 1, the service’s partner — 0.7, a competitor — 0.6, the checker owner — 0.3, the developer itself — 0. Its freshness also matters: tests less than a year old count at full weight, tests one to two years old count at half weight, and older tests count at one-quarter weight.
While there are few external tests, the score is pulled toward the middle of the scale: one successful screenshot won't move a browser to the top. Such a score is marked as preliminary.
20%
The average of two scales, in dollars. The first is the monthly price of the cheapest paid plan: up to $5 per month — 100 points; each price doubling deducts 15 points. The second is the price of one profile on that plan: up to $0.10 — 100 points; each price doubling deducts 15 points. A permanent free plan adds 10 points.
20%
One point each for an API, automation, team access, cloud profiles, and mobile profiles; three or more types of automation add another half-point. Half a point each for cryptocurrency payments, each of Windows, macOS, and Linux, and a second browser engine. The maximum is 8 points, equal to 100 on the scale.
10%
The user rating on major review platforms, if a platform has at least 20 reviews: 3.0 or lower — 0 points, 5.0 — 100. No such rating or fewer than 20 reviews — 50 points, the midpoint of the scale.
On the site we show a different rating: the average of the reviews we collected ourselves — summaries of reviews from review platforms and forums over the past two years, plus reviews left on our site. We count only the stars the authors gave and show the average once there are at least five such ratings. It is not part of the ranking formula.
We recalculate rankings when we update the data. Results for each checker are available in the matrix on the homepage and on the browser's page.
The dates of the latest checks appear at the top of the page. The security history check date is also shown on each browser's page.
This list includes services where verified information shows that users lose money, data, or accounts: scams, data leaks, subscription traps, antidetect browser impersonators, and abandoned projects. Each entry includes the reason, what we found, and what people who have already paid should do. The “Monitoring” label means there are warning signs, but we have not been able to confirm them yet.
A service can be removed from the list by fixing the problem and refunding those affected. Open the blacklist
Some links on the site are affiliate links: if you pay for a subscription through one of them, we receive a commission. The price is the same for you. This does not affect a browser's ranking position, which is calculated using the formula above. More details are available in our advertising disclosure.
Prices and terms change, and we may not notice in time. If a figure on the site is outdated or incorrect, send us a link to the source: a pricing page, changelog, or company statement. Once confirmed, we'll correct it.
Developers: if you disagree with our description of an incident, send us the company's official response and we'll publish it alongside the description. You can suggest a new browser through the submission form.