Vision
Chrome and Safari browser engines, Android fingerprints
- Fingerprint
- 62/100
- Starting price
- $29/month
- Profiles
- 50
- Fingerprint checkers
- 1/3
Trial access — 4 days free
Vision review
Vision is an antidetect browser for media buying and multi-accounting, available since March 2024. It is owned by Emperat Solutions Ltd, registered in London. In addition to the Chrome engine, it offers Safari for macOS 15 and later, as well as Android fingerprints that, according to the company, were captured from real devices. The entry-level plan costs $29 per month for 50 profiles without team access, or $20 per month when billed annually.
We haven’t run our own tests yet. In public tests (10 results, checked on October 9, 2026), it passed 1 of 3 tested fingerprint checkers.
Strengths
- Second browser engine: Safari, on macOS 15 and later
- Chrome engine updated 8 times since May 2026
- Cloud and Local APIs
- Team permissions down to the folder level
Weaknesses
- Team access only from the $79 plan
- No free plan, only a 4-day trial
- Refunds at the company’s discretion and only in USDT
Plans
| Plan | Per month | Profiles | Team members | Per profile |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Microstarting price in the ranking | $29 | 50 | 1 | $0.58 |
| Base | $79 | 150 | 3 | $0.53 |
| Standard | $129 | 300 | 3 | $0.43 |
| Pro | $189 | 500 | 5 | $0.38 |
| Max | $289 | 1000 | 5 | $0.29 |
| Ultra | $389 | 1500 | 6 | $0.26 |
Trial access — 4 days free. Prices are in the service’s currency for monthly billing; annual billing is cheaper.
Found the right plan? Start with the entry-level plan — you can upgrade anytime.
Open browser.visionTest results
62/100
Score based on public tests from reviews, research, and benchmarks, checked October 9, 2026. The calculation includes 10 results of 23 found: we do not count the vendor’s claims about itself or checks on other services. Passes 1, partially passes 2, and fails 0 out of 3 tested checkers. We have not run our own test yet.
- Pixelscan6 testsPasses
- CreepJS1 testPartially passes
- Iphey3 testsPartially passes
- BrowserLeaksNo public tests
- WhoerNo public tests
- fv.proNo public tests
- BrowserScanNo public tests
- AmIUniqueNo public tests
- DeviceInfoNo public tests
- f.visionNo public tests
Tests are published by different parties: independent reviewers, partners, and competitors. Independent and recent tests carry more weight, while competitor and partner tests carry less; when there are few external results, the score trends toward 50, meaning “not proven.”
All browsers matrixSecurity
All industry incidentsWe found no public reports of hacks, leaks, or funds stolen through Vision. This is not a guarantee: we check public sources, not the service’s code.
Not a service breach, but worth knowing
The company warned users about scammers: payments can be made only through the account dashboard on the website, and Vision does not send discount offers from other accounts. It did not report any specific cases.
We count breaches and leaks on the service’s side, attacks through updates and extensions, account takeovers, and hacking attempts reported by the company itself. Brand impersonation, unverified complaints, patched vulnerabilities that were not exploited, DDoS attacks without data leaks, and account bans by platforms are not included in the incident count; they appear in the “Worth knowing” section. Checked October 8, 2026.
Features
- Engines
- Chromium, Safari (WebKit, macOS 15+)
- Operating systems
- Windows, macOS, Linux
- Automation
- Selenium, Puppeteer, Playwright, Local API, Action synchronizer
- API
- yes
- Teamwork
- yes
- Cloud profiles
- yes
- Mobile profiles
- yes
- Crypto payments
- yes
- Free plan
- no
- Trial access
- 4 days free
Test it with your own workflows
The score is based on publicly available tests by other authors, each using their own setup and test date. Your proxies, accounts, and workflows may produce different results.
Vision news
All Vision news 11Vision: Chrome 155 and Android Profile Improvements
In version 4.0.6, the Chrome engine was updated to 155.0.8059.40, and Android fingerprint spoofing was improved.
Vision in September: Chrome 152 and 154 Browser Engines, UDP for New Providers
Alongside the new 4.0 interface, September also brought version 3.7.14 with Chrome 152, 4.0.2 with SOCKS5 enabled by default, and 4.0.3 with Chrome 154.
Vision 4.0: New Interface
The app’s interface has been completely redesigned: a new bulk actions panel with draggable buttons, bulk profile creation, a revamped proxy section, and a context menu. The same release also adds Chrome 153.
Reviews 3
Write a review—3 ratings from other platforms
We show the average from 5 ratings
We show the average from 5 ratings
Showing 3 of 3
There is no real customer service: when a problem comes up there is nobody to contact, and everything is in Russian. Update: an agent named Alex helped me, and I think my issue will be resolved.
I tested AdsPower, GoLogin, Dolphin and Incogniton; AdsPower and Vision are my favourites. GoLogin had leaks, Dolphin leaked badly and returned the opposite location when I set a custom one, and Incogniton has a poor interface and costs a lot. Everything in Vision is good except the proxy checker, which shows my UK IP as USA; nothing has leaked so far, but I hope they fix it.
Leave a review
Tell us about your experience: how many profiles you use, what you use them for, and what went wrong. We read reviews manually and don't publish promotional content or reviews without specific details.
I've never had such undermining, passive-aggressive support. I reported a feature that had worked for our team and then stopped working, and instead of looking into it the agent, Alex, kept correcting my terminology and treating me as non-technical. After I sent a video it turned out to be a bug on Vision's side, and only then did he finally understand what I had been explaining.