Multilogin vs Octo Browser
Multilogin is #4 in the ranking, Octo Browser is #3. Below, we explain who each browser is best for, followed by a table comparing the entry price, free plan, profiles, fingerprint tests, security incidents, and features.
What to choose
The conclusions below are based on the table. We ignore minor differences: less than 10% in price, less than 20% in the number of profiles, and less than 5 points out of 100 in the fingerprint score.
Choose Multilogin if
- you want to start for free: 5 profiles on the free plan
- you need more profiles on the entry-level plan: 10 vs. 3
- security history matters: no public incidents were found, while Octo Browser has 1 incident
- you need automation: CLI
- you need a browser that has been on the market longer: since 2015 vs. 2021
Choose Octo Browser if
- public fingerprint test results matter: 79 of 100 vs. 71 of 100
- you need a version for Android
- user ratings matter: 3.9 out of 5 vs. 2.8 out of 5
All parameters side by side
Change a browser or add a third one, and that comparison will open.
Select at least two different browsers.
best valuemuted rows show values that are the same for everyone
| Parameter | ||
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Ranking position | #4 | #3 — best value |
| User rating | 2.8 out of 5 | 3.9 out of 5 — best value |
| Reviews | 109 | 83 |
| Fingerprint | ||
| Fingerprint score | 71 of 100 | 79 of 100 — best value |
| Checkers passed | 5 of 6 tested — best value | 4 of 5 tested |
| Browser engines | Chromium, Firefox — best value | Chromium |
| Price | ||
| Starting price | $11 per month | €10 per month |
| Profiles on the entry-level plan | 10 — best value | 3 |
| Free profiles | 5 — best value | no |
| Trial access | Free plan | 2 days free |
| Crypto payments | yes | yes |
| Security | ||
| Security incidents | not found — best value | 1 incident: account logins with known passwords, February 2026 |
| Platforms and features | ||
| Operating systems | Windows, macOS, Linux | Windows, macOS, Linux, Android — best value |
| API | yes | yes |
| Automation | Selenium, Puppeteer, Playwright, CLI, Local API — best value | Selenium, Puppeteer, Playwright, Local API |
| Teamwork | yes | yes |
| Cloud profiles | yes | yes |
| Mobile profiles | yes | yes |
| On the market | since 2015 — best value | since 2021 |
| Fingerprint checkers · public tests, checked October 9, 2026 | ||
| Pixelscan | passes | passes |
| CreepJS | passes | passes |
| BrowserLeaks | no tests | no tests |
| Iphey | passes | passes |
| Whoer | passes | passes |
| fv.pro | fails | fails |
| BrowserScan | passes | no tests |
| AmIUnique | no tests | no tests |
| DeviceInfo | no tests | no tests |
| f.vision | no tests | no tests |
Data as of October 14, 2026. Prices are taken from service websites, and fingerprint test results come from public sources. Check the service’s website before paying.
“Visit site” links are affiliate links: if you subscribe through one, the site receives a commission. This does not affect the ranking order.
A quick look at each browser
The table answers “which is better?”, while this section answers “which one is right for whom?”. See each browser’s page for details and reviews.
Mimic browser engine and cloud Android phones
- Strength
- Cloud Android phones (Android 10–16) on the same plans
- Weakness
- A review platform removed fake reviews
- Use cases
- smm, multi-accounting, e-commerce
Engine follows Chrome within 2–6 days
- Strength
- Chromium 150–155 shipped 2–6 days after Chrome
- Weakness
- Team access only from the €169 plan
- Use cases
- media buying, e-commerce, crypto
Frequently asked questions
More comparisons



