AdsPower vs RoxyBrowser
AdsPower is #7 in the ranking, RoxyBrowser is #9. Below, we explain who each browser is best for, followed by a table comparing the entry price, free plan, profiles, fingerprint tests, security incidents, and features.
What to choose
The conclusions below are based on the table. We ignore minor differences: less than 10% in price, less than 20% in the number of profiles, and less than 5 points out of 100 in the fingerprint score.
Choose AdsPower if
- you need automation: CLI and RPA bot (no-code)
Choose RoxyBrowser if
- you need a lower entry price: $8 per month vs. $9 per month
- security history matters: no public incidents were found, while AdsPower has 1 incident
- you need automation: Scenarios (no-code)
- user ratings matter: 4.4 out of 5 vs. 3.9 out of 5
All parameters side by side
Change a browser or add a third one, and that comparison will open.
Select at least two different browsers.
best valuemuted rows show values that are the same for everyone
| Parameter | ||
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Ranking position | #7 — best value | #9 |
| User rating | 3.9 out of 5 | 4.4 out of 5 — best value |
| Reviews | 99 | 15 |
| Fingerprint | ||
| Fingerprint score | 60 of 100 — best value | 53 of 100, preliminary |
| Checkers passed | 3 of 6 tested — best value | 1 of 2 tested |
| Browser engines | Chromium, Firefox | Chromium, Firefox |
| Price | ||
| Starting price | $9 per month | $8 per month — best value |
| Profiles on the entry-level plan | 12 | 12 |
| Free profiles | 2 | 2 |
| Trial access | Free plan | Free plan |
| Crypto payments | yes | yes |
| Security | ||
| Security incidents | 1 incident: cryptocurrency theft via extensions, January 2025 | not found — best value |
| Platforms and features | ||
| Operating systems | Windows, macOS, Linux | Windows, macOS, Linux |
| API | yes | yes |
| Automation | Local API, Selenium, Puppeteer, Playwright, CLI, RPA bot (no-code), Action synchronizer — best value | Selenium, Puppeteer, Playwright, Local API, Action synchronizer, Scenarios (no-code) |
| Teamwork | yes | yes |
| Cloud profiles | yes | yes |
| Mobile profiles | yes | yes |
| On the market | since 2019 | since 2018 |
| Fingerprint checkers · public tests, checked October 9, 2026 | ||
| Pixelscan | passes | partially |
| CreepJS | passes | no tests |
| BrowserLeaks | no tests | no tests |
| Iphey | fails | passes |
| Whoer | passes | no tests |
| fv.pro | no tests | no tests |
| BrowserScan | fails | no tests |
| AmIUnique | no tests | no tests |
| DeviceInfo | no tests | no tests |
| f.vision | partially | no tests |
Data as of October 15, 2026. Prices are taken from service websites, and fingerprint test results come from public sources. Check the service’s website before paying.
“Visit site” links are affiliate links: if you subscribe through one, the site receives a commission. This does not affect the ranking order.
A quick look at each browser
The table answers “which is better?”, while this section answers “which one is right for whom?”. See each browser’s page for details and reviews.
Chromium and Firefox browser engines, no-code RPA
- Strength
- 12 profiles for $9 per month, or $5.40 with annual billing
- Weakness
- Theft from wallets in January 2025
- Use cases
- media buying, e-commerce, smm
Chromium and Firefox, per-profile pricing
- Strength
- Two browser engines: Chromium 154 and Firefox 146
- Weakness
- Subscriptions are non-refundable
- Use cases
- smm, e-commerce, media buying
Frequently asked questions
More comparisons
AdsPower vs BitBrowser
AdsPower vs Dolphin {anty}
AdsPower vs ixBrowser