Octo Browser vs RoxyBrowser
Octo Browser is #3 in the ranking, RoxyBrowser is #9. Below, we explain who each browser is best for, followed by a table comparing the entry price, free plan, profiles, fingerprint tests, security incidents, and features.
What to choose
The conclusions below are based on the table. We ignore minor differences: less than 10% in price, less than 20% in the number of profiles, and less than 5 points out of 100 in the fingerprint score.
Choose Octo Browser if
- you need a version for Android
Choose RoxyBrowser if
- you need a lower entry price: $8 per month vs. €10 per month
- you want to start for free: 2 profiles on the free plan
- you need more profiles on the entry-level plan: 12 vs. 3
- security history matters: no public incidents were found, while Octo Browser has 1 incident
- you need automation: Action synchronizer and Scenarios (no-code)
- user ratings matter: 4.4 out of 5 vs. 3.9 out of 5
- you need a browser that has been on the market longer: since 2018 vs. 2021
All parameters side by side
Change a browser or add a third one, and that comparison will open.
Select at least two different browsers.
best valuemuted rows show values that are the same for everyone
| Parameter | ||
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Ranking position | #3 — best value | #9 |
| User rating | 3.9 out of 5 | 4.4 out of 5 — best value |
| Reviews | 83 | 15 |
| Fingerprint | ||
| Fingerprint score | 79 of 100 — best value | 53 of 100, preliminary |
| Checkers passed | 4 of 5 tested — best value | 1 of 2 tested |
| Browser engines | Chromium | Chromium, Firefox — best value |
| Price | ||
| Starting price | €10 per month | $8 per month — best value |
| Profiles on the entry-level plan | 3 | 12 — best value |
| Free profiles | no | 2 — best value |
| Trial access | 2 days free | Free plan |
| Crypto payments | yes | yes |
| Security | ||
| Security incidents | 1 incident: account logins with known passwords, February 2026 | not found — best value |
| Platforms and features | ||
| Operating systems | Windows, macOS, Linux, Android — best value | Windows, macOS, Linux |
| API | yes | yes |
| Automation | Selenium, Puppeteer, Playwright, Local API | Selenium, Puppeteer, Playwright, Local API, Action synchronizer, Scenarios (no-code) — best value |
| Teamwork | yes | yes |
| Cloud profiles | yes | yes |
| Mobile profiles | yes | yes |
| On the market | since 2021 | since 2018 — best value |
| Fingerprint checkers · public tests, checked October 9, 2026 | ||
| Pixelscan | passes | partially |
| CreepJS | passes | no tests |
| BrowserLeaks | no tests | no tests |
| Iphey | passes | passes |
| Whoer | passes | no tests |
| fv.pro | fails | no tests |
| BrowserScan | no tests | no tests |
| AmIUnique | no tests | no tests |
| DeviceInfo | no tests | no tests |
| f.vision | no tests | no tests |
Data as of October 15, 2026. Prices are taken from service websites, and fingerprint test results come from public sources. Check the service’s website before paying.
“Visit site” links are affiliate links: if you subscribe through one, the site receives a commission. This does not affect the ranking order.
A quick look at each browser
The table answers “which is better?”, while this section answers “which one is right for whom?”. See each browser’s page for details and reviews.
Engine follows Chrome within 2–6 days
- Strength
- Chromium 150–155 shipped 2–6 days after Chrome
- Weakness
- Team access only from the €169 plan
- Use cases
- media buying, e-commerce, crypto
Chromium and Firefox, per-profile pricing
- Strength
- Two browser engines: Chromium 154 and Firefox 146
- Weakness
- Subscriptions are non-refundable
- Use cases
- smm, e-commerce, media buying
Frequently asked questions
More comparisons
Multilogin vs Octo Browser
Dolphin {anty} vs Octo Browser
GoLogin vs Octo BrowserGoLogin vs RoxyBrowser
ixBrowser vs Octo BrowserixBrowser vs RoxyBrowserMultilogin vs RoxyBrowserOcto Browser vs UndetectableRoxyBrowser vs Undetectable