Multilogin vs RoxyBrowser
Multilogin is #4 in the ranking, RoxyBrowser is #9. Below, we explain who each browser is best for, followed by a table comparing the entry price, free plan, profiles, fingerprint tests, security incidents, and features.
What to choose
The conclusions below are based on the table. We ignore minor differences: less than 10% in price, less than 20% in the number of profiles, and less than 5 points out of 100 in the fingerprint score.
Choose Multilogin if
- you need more free profiles: 5 profiles; RoxyBrowser offers 2 profiles
- you need automation: CLI
- you need a browser that has been on the market longer: since 2015 vs. 2018
Choose RoxyBrowser if
- you need a lower entry price: $8 per month vs. $11 per month
- you need automation: Action synchronizer and Scenarios (no-code)
- user ratings matter: 4.4 out of 5 vs. 2.8 out of 5
All parameters side by side
Change a browser or add a third one, and that comparison will open.
Select at least two different browsers.
best valuemuted rows show values that are the same for everyone
| Parameter | ||
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Ranking position | #4 — best value | #9 |
| User rating | 2.8 out of 5 | 4.4 out of 5 — best value |
| Reviews | 109 | 15 |
| Fingerprint | ||
| Fingerprint score | 71 of 100 — best value | 53 of 100, preliminary |
| Checkers passed | 5 of 6 tested — best value | 1 of 2 tested |
| Browser engines | Chromium, Firefox | Chromium, Firefox |
| Price | ||
| Starting price | $11 per month | $8 per month — best value |
| Profiles on the entry-level plan | 10 | 12 |
| Free profiles | 5 — best value | 2 |
| Trial access | Free plan | Free plan |
| Crypto payments | yes | yes |
| Security | ||
| Security incidents | not found | not found |
| Platforms and features | ||
| Operating systems | Windows, macOS, Linux | Windows, macOS, Linux |
| API | yes | yes |
| Automation | Selenium, Puppeteer, Playwright, CLI, Local API | Selenium, Puppeteer, Playwright, Local API, Action synchronizer, Scenarios (no-code) — best value |
| Teamwork | yes | yes |
| Cloud profiles | yes | yes |
| Mobile profiles | yes | yes |
| On the market | since 2015 — best value | since 2018 |
| Fingerprint checkers · public tests, checked October 9, 2026 | ||
| Pixelscan | passes | partially |
| CreepJS | passes | no tests |
| BrowserLeaks | no tests | no tests |
| Iphey | passes | passes |
| Whoer | passes | no tests |
| fv.pro | fails | no tests |
| BrowserScan | passes | no tests |
| AmIUnique | no tests | no tests |
| DeviceInfo | no tests | no tests |
| f.vision | no tests | no tests |
Data as of October 15, 2026. Prices are taken from service websites, and fingerprint test results come from public sources. Check the service’s website before paying.
“Visit site” links are affiliate links: if you subscribe through one, the site receives a commission. This does not affect the ranking order.
A quick look at each browser
The table answers “which is better?”, while this section answers “which one is right for whom?”. See each browser’s page for details and reviews.
Mimic browser engine and cloud Android phones
- Strength
- Cloud Android phones (Android 10–16) on the same plans
- Weakness
- A review platform removed fake reviews
- Use cases
- smm, multi-accounting, e-commerce
Chromium and Firefox, per-profile pricing
- Strength
- Two browser engines: Chromium 154 and Firefox 146
- Weakness
- Subscriptions are non-refundable
- Use cases
- smm, e-commerce, media buying
Frequently asked questions
More comparisons


