Afina vs Octo Browser
Afina is #8 in the ranking, Octo Browser is #3. Below, we explain who each browser is best for, followed by a table comparing the entry price, free plan, profiles, fingerprint tests, security incidents, and features.
What to choose
The conclusions below are based on the table. We ignore minor differences: less than 10% in price, less than 20% in the number of profiles, and less than 5 points out of 100 in the fingerprint score.
Choose Afina if
- you need a lower entry price: $9 per month vs. €10 per month
- you need more profiles on the entry-level plan: 20 vs. 3
- security history matters: no public incidents were found, while Octo Browser has 1 incident
- you need automation: Scenarios (no-code) and Action synchronizer
- user ratings matter: 5.0 out of 5 vs. 3.9 out of 5
Choose Octo Browser if
- you need: mobile profiles
- you need automation: Selenium
- you need a version for Linux and Android
- you need a browser that has been on the market longer: since 2021 vs. 2024
All parameters side by side
Change a browser or add a third one, and that comparison will open.
Select at least two different browsers.
best valuemuted rows show values that are the same for everyone
| Parameter | ||
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Ranking position | #8 | #3 — best value |
| User rating | 5.0 out of 5 — best value | 3.9 out of 5 |
| Reviews | 16 | 83 |
| Fingerprint | ||
| Fingerprint score | 64 of 100, preliminary | 79 of 100 — best value |
| Checkers passed | 2 of 2 tested | 4 of 5 tested — best value |
| Browser engines | Chromium | Chromium |
| Price | ||
| Starting price | $9 per month — best value | €10 per month |
| Profiles on the entry-level plan | 20 — best value | 3 |
| Free profiles | no | no |
| Trial access | 4 days free | 2 days free |
| Crypto payments | yes | yes |
| Security | ||
| Security incidents | not found — best value | 1 incident: account logins with known passwords, February 2026 |
| Platforms and features | ||
| Operating systems | Windows, macOS | Windows, macOS, Linux, Android — best value |
| API | yes | yes |
| Automation | Puppeteer, Playwright, Local API, Scenarios (no-code), Action synchronizer — best value | Selenium, Puppeteer, Playwright, Local API |
| Teamwork | yes | yes |
| Cloud profiles | yes | yes |
| Mobile profiles | no | yes — best value |
| On the market | since 2024 | since 2021 — best value |
| Fingerprint checkers · public tests, checked October 9, 2026 | ||
| Pixelscan | passes | passes |
| CreepJS | passes | passes |
| BrowserLeaks | no tests | no tests |
| Iphey | no tests | passes |
| Whoer | no tests | passes |
| fv.pro | no tests | fails |
| BrowserScan | no tests | no tests |
| AmIUnique | no tests | no tests |
| DeviceInfo | no tests | no tests |
| f.vision | no tests | no tests |
Data as of October 15, 2026. Prices are taken from service websites, and fingerprint test results come from public sources. Check the service’s website before paying.
“Visit site” links are affiliate links: if you subscribe through one, the site receives a commission. This does not affect the ranking order.
A quick look at each browser
The table answers “which is better?”, while this section answers “which one is right for whom?”. See each browser’s page for details and reviews.
No-code scenarios and MCP for AI agents
- Strength
- Task scheduler and Node.js modules
- Weakness
- No free plan and no Linux version
- Use cases
- media buying, e-commerce, crypto
Engine follows Chrome within 2–6 days
- Strength
- Chromium 150–155 shipped 2–6 days after Chrome
- Weakness
- Team access only from the €169 plan
- Use cases
- media buying, e-commerce, crypto
Frequently asked questions
More comparisons
Multilogin vs Octo Browser
Dolphin {anty} vs Octo Browser
GoLogin vs Octo BrowserAfina vs GoLogin
ixBrowser vs Octo BrowserAfina vs ixBrowserAfina vs MultiloginOcto Browser vs UndetectableAfina vs Undetectable