BitBrowser vs Hidemium
BitBrowser is #10 in the ranking, Hidemium is #6. Below, we explain who each browser is best for, followed by a table comparing the entry price, free plan, profiles, fingerprint tests, security incidents, and features.
What to choose
The conclusions below are based on the table. We ignore minor differences: less than 10% in price, less than 20% in the number of profiles, and less than 5 points out of 100 in the fingerprint score.
Choose BitBrowser if
- you need a lower entry price: $10 per month vs. $15 per month
- you need more free profiles: 10 profiles; Hidemium offers 5 profiles
- you need more profiles on the entry-level plan: 50 vs. 30
- you need automation: Selenium and RPA bot (no-code)
Choose Hidemium if
- public fingerprint test results matter: 67 of 100 vs. 55 of 100
- security history matters: no public incidents were found, while BitBrowser has 1 incident
- you need automation: Scenarios (no-code)
All parameters side by side
Change a browser or add a third one, and that comparison will open.
Select at least two different browsers.
best valuemuted rows show values that are the same for everyone
| Parameter | ||
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Ranking position | #10 | #6 — best value |
| User rating | 1.8 out of 5 | not yet |
| Reviews | 9 | 4 |
| Fingerprint | ||
| Fingerprint score | 55 of 100 | 67 of 100 — best value |
| Checkers passed | 1 of 4 tested | 4 of 5 tested — best value |
| Browser engines | Chromium, Firefox | Chromium, Firefox, Safari — best value |
| Price | ||
| Starting price | $10 per month — best value | $15 per month |
| Profiles on the entry-level plan | 50 — best value | 30 |
| Free profiles | 10 — best value | 5 |
| Trial access | Free plan | 3 days free |
| Crypto payments | no | no |
| Security | ||
| Security incidents | 1 incident: server-side extension cache breach, theft from wallets, August 2023 | not found — best value |
| Platforms and features | ||
| Operating systems | Windows, macOS | Windows, macOS |
| API | yes | yes |
| Automation | Local API, Selenium, Puppeteer, RPA bot (no-code), Action synchronizer — best value | Local API, Puppeteer, Scenarios (no-code), Action synchronizer |
| Teamwork | yes | yes |
| Cloud profiles | yes | yes |
| Mobile profiles | yes | yes |
| On the market | since 2019 | since 2021 |
| Fingerprint checkers · public tests, checked October 9, 2026 | ||
| Pixelscan | partially | passes |
| CreepJS | no tests | passes |
| BrowserLeaks | partially | passes |
| Iphey | partially | partially |
| Whoer | passes | passes |
| fv.pro | no tests | no tests |
| BrowserScan | no tests | no tests |
| AmIUnique | no tests | no tests |
| DeviceInfo | no tests | no tests |
| f.vision | no tests | no tests |
Data as of October 15, 2026. Prices are taken from service websites, and fingerprint test results come from public sources. Check the service’s website before paying.
“Visit site” links are affiliate links: if you subscribe through one, the site receives a commission. This does not affect the ranking order.
A quick look at each browser
The table answers “which is better?”, while this section answers “which one is right for whom?”. See each browser’s page for details and reviews.
10 profiles for free, 50 for $10 a month
- Strength
- 10 profiles free, with no time limit
- Weakness
- 2023 leak and cryptocurrency theft
- Use cases
- e-commerce, smm, media buying
Three engines, cloud plans from $15/month
- Strength
- 5 profiles for free, plus 3 days with up to 1,000 profiles
- Weakness
- Stripe payment: +20% tax
- Use cases
- e-commerce, media buying, smm
Frequently asked questions
More comparisons
AdsPower vs BitBrowser
Hidemium vs ixBrowser
BitBrowser vs ixBrowser
